SSPY vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SSPY (Stratified LargeCap Index ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SSPY is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past year, SSPY returned 20.12% vs 11.63% for BDGS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSPY charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

SSPY vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSPY achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

SSPY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSPY vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF	10.20%	12.88%	-0.90%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SSPY and BDGS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.55

The correlation between SSPY and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SSPY vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSPY	BDGS
Technology	20.2%	37.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	10.9%
Healthcare	11.9%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	11.7%	4.1%
Industrials	10.2%	6.6%
Financial Services	10.0%	9.3%
Communication Services	6.0%	16.6%
Energy	5.8%	2.6%
Utilities	5.6%	1.9%
Real Estate	3.4%	1.5%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.5%

Return for Risk

SSPY vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSPY

SSPY Risk / Return Rank: 61
SSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSPY vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSPY	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.84	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.75	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	2.90	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.55	12.72	-2.17

SSPY vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSPY and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSPY vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSPY drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSPY and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSPY	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-9.12%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	-4.03%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-2.17%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-0.66%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.92%	+0.99%

Volatility

SSPY vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that SSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSPY	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	2.30%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	5.17%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	6.38%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	8.22%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	8.22%	+6.26%

SSPY vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSPY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSPY vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF	1.26%	1.38%	0.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSPY and BDGS in my portfolio?

SSPY and BDGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSPY or BDGS?

SSPY has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSPY dropped -16.16% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, SSPY or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, SSPY leads with 20.12% vs 11.63% for BDGS. On fees, SSPY is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SSPY or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, SSPY has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSPY or BDGS?

SSPY is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSPY or BDGS?

SSPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between SSPY and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SSPY and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.