SSO vs. NVDG
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSO is passively managed, while NVDG is actively managed. Over the past year, SSO returned 53.91% vs 88.87% for NVDG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
SSO vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 23.86% return.
SSO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 53.91%
- 3Y*
- 38.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
NVDG
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- 21.48%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 6M
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 88.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 20.20% | 26.19% | -5.76% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 23.86% | 32.45% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and NVDG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SSO and NVDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
NVDG
SSO vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSO | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.09 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 4.75 | +8.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSO | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.32 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SSO vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -66.19% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -42.72% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -14.96% | +14.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -23.05% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 18.79% | -14.66% |
Volatility
SSO vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 5.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.17%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 25.17% | -19.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 50.28% | -32.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 67.73% | -44.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 90.65% | -57.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 90.65% | -54.76% |
SSO vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than NVDG's 9.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.54% | 11.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and NVDG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDG has higher volatility (25.17%) compared to SSO (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 88.87% vs 53.91% for SSO. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 88.87% return vs 53.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.75% for NVDG.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer