SSO vs. DDM
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SSO tracks the S&P 500 while DDM tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSO returned 24.02%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for DDM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DDM.
Performance
SSO vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than DDM's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed DDM with an annualized return of 24.02%, while DDM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.87% annualized return.
SSO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 47.12%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
DDM
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.87%
SSO vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 15.08% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 11.15% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and DDM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SSO and DDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (3 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SSO vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
DDM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SSO
DDM
Financial Services
SSO
DDM
Communication Services
SSO
DDM
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
DDM
Healthcare
SSO
DDM
Industrials
SSO
DDM
Consumer Defensive
SSO
DDM
Energy
SSO
DDM
Utilities
SSO
DDM
-
Real Estate
SSO
DDM
-
Basic Materials
SSO
DDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
DDM
SSO vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.87 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 6.86 | +3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, roughly equal to the maximum DDM drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and DDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -81.70% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -19.31% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -31.62% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -40.18% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | -63.13% | +3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -1.61% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.55% | -17.31% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 5.28% | -1.04% |
Volatility
SSO vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) have volatilities of 8.74% and 8.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 8.72% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.17% | 19.64% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 25.09% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 29.67% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.95% | 34.81% | +1.14% |
SSO vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than DDM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than DDM's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.90% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and DDM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to DDM (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs DDM's -81.70%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.02% vs 19.87% for DDM. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 19.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.
SSO tracks S&P 500, while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.95% for DDM.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and DDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer