SSO vs. BRKL
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSO is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
SSO vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SSO vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | -1.72% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and BRKL is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSO vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -7.03% | -77.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -0.13% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -4.14% | -15.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | — | — |
Volatility
SSO vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.63% | 30.99% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 30.99% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 30.99% | +4.92% |
SSO vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and BRKL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for SSO and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer