SSMHX vs. WWNPX
SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSMHX returned 11.70%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSMHX charges 0.02%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSMHX achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 25.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMHX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.73% annualized return.
SSMHX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
WWNPX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 15.27% | 12.90% | 10.73% | 25.21% | -25.43% | 13.08% | 32.46% | 28.00% | -9.21% | 18.26% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 25.77% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMHX and WWNPX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SSMHX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMHX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
SSMHX
WWNPX
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMHX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 0.41 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 0.98 | +8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMHX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMHX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMHX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.61% | -67.87% | +26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | -27.71% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.38% | -41.13% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -41.13% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | -43.51% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -23.77% | +21.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -13.96% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 11.64% | -8.84% |
Volatility
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) is 3.94%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that SSMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMHX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 8.95% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 26.93% | -13.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 34.26% | -16.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 33.12% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 28.78% | -6.42% |
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMHX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMHX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
SSMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than WWNPX's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 6.18% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 2.31% | 16.30% | 2.91% | 3.65% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 1.71% | 0.73% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 6.53% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSMHX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to SSMHX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMHX dropped -41.61% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSMHX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer