PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMGX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMGX achieves a 17.87% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMGX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


SSMGX

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.26%
6M
12.55%
YTD
17.87%
1Y
26.23%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
11.02%

FSMAX

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.38%
6M
9.51%
YTD
14.84%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
17.87%9.40%13.42%16.93%-25.59%15.80%35.97%29.19%-10.88%15.69%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.84%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMGX and FSMAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.95

The correlation between SSMGX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMGX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMGX
SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSMGXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.27

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

7.94

+1.78

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMGX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMGX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMGX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMGXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-50.55%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-10.26%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-26.82%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-36.31%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-50.55%

+14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.92%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-12.09%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.93%

-0.17%

Volatility

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) at 4.94%. This indicates that SSMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMGXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

4.94%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

13.28%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

17.81%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

22.43%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

30.22%

-8.63%

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMGX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

SSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
4.65%5.48%4.69%3.13%1.73%15.89%3.44%3.14%9.80%6.81%0.17%10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMGX and FSMAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMGX has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FSMAX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMGX dropped -65.75% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

SSMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMGX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer