SSMG vs. PCLO

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PCLO.

Performance

SSMG vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSMG

• 1D: 3.18%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PCLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 2.19%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	$91.76K	$127.38K	$166.45K
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	$5.89K	$3.26K	$5.76K

SSMG vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	7.79%
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMG and PCLO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026	0.01

Return for Risk

SSMG vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLO

PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSMG vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSMG	PCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	6.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	11.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.68	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	19.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	119.87	—

Drawdowns

SSMG vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, which is greater than PCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and PCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSMG	PCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-0.76%	-12.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	0.00%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-0.03%	-3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSMG	PCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.58%	0.84%	+27.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.58%	1.12%	+27.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.58%	1.12%	+27.46%

SSMG vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSMG vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison

SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	5.19%	5.53%	0.44%
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSMG and PCLO in my portfolio?

SSMG and PCLO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSMG or PCLO?

On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSMG or PCLO?

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SSMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSMG or PCLO?

PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.

What is the main difference between SSMG and PCLO?

SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PCLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.29% for PCLO.