SSMG vs. ASMF

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and ASMF (Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while ASMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ASMF.

Performance

SSMG vs. ASMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSMG

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -4.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.87%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMG vs. ASMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	5.50%
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMG and ASMF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

SSMG vs. ASMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMF

ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 50
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMG vs. ASMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSMG	ASMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.28	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.76	—

Drawdowns

SSMG vs. ASMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum ASMF drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and ASMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSMG	ASMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-15.31%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.85%	-3.16%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-7.37%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSMG	ASMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.54%	11.56%	+15.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.54%	10.95%	+16.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.54%	10.95%	+16.59%

SSMG vs. ASMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSMG vs. ASMF - Dividend Comparison

SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	0.20%	0.22%	1.66%
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSMG and ASMF in my portfolio?

SSMG and ASMF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSMG or ASMF?

On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSMG or ASMF?

SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ASMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSMG or ASMF?

ASMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.

What is the main difference between SSMG and ASMF?

SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ASMF is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.80% for ASMF.