SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L
SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLV.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while XDEV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLV.L returned 15.85%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for XDEV.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLV.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.
Performance
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLV.L is traded in USD, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 34.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLV.L has outperformed XDEV.L with an annualized return of 15.85%, while XDEV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 113.89%
- 3Y*
- 45.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
XDEV.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 12.15%
- YTD
- 34.16%
- 6M
- 38.41%
- 1Y
- 66.17%
- 3Y*
- 30.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 2.90% | 147.68% | 21.10% | -0.93% | 3.59% | -12.95% | 45.93% | 16.33% | -8.71% | 3.69% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 34.16% | 40.36% | 5.01% | 19.23% | -9.79% | 20.57% | -4.03% | 19.16% | -14.37% | 22.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLV.L and XDEV.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SSLV.L and XDEV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLV.L
XDEV.L
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.81 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 7.54 | -4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 29.47 | -23.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 4.46 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.04 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.68 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than XDEV.L's maximum drawdown of -38.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and XDEV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -38.95% | -35.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.61% | -8.73% | -31.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -14.69% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | -26.72% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -38.95% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.24% | -0.86% | -34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -7.12% | -45.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.65% | 2.24% | +16.41% |
Volatility
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a higher volatility of 17.44% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) at 5.95%. This indicates that SSLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.44% | 5.95% | +11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.09% | 11.90% | +42.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.84% | 14.78% | +42.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 15.73% | +19.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 16.72% | +14.17% |
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLV.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLV.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLV.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLV.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLV.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.L.
SSLV.L is categorized as Silver, while XDEV.L is Global Equities. SSLV.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SSLV.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLV.L and XDEV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer