SSK vs. CBTO
SSK (REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF) and CBTO (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SSK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Solana, while CBTO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SSK is passively managed, while CBTO is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTO.
Performance
SSK vs. CBTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSK achieves a -35.36% return, which is significantly lower than CBTO's -8.32% return.
SSK
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 20.10%
- 6M
- -41.78%
- YTD
- -35.36%
- 1Y
- -51.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -9.46%
- YTD
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSK vs. CBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SSK REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF | -35.36% | -46.49% |
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -8.32% | -13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSK and CBTO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSK vs. CBTO — Risk / Return Rank
SSK
CBTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSK vs. CBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF (SSK) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSK | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSK vs. CBTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSK drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than CBTO's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSK and CBTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSK | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -21.27% | -52.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.24% | -21.16% | -46.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.45% | -15.64% | -25.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.98% | — | — |
Volatility
SSK vs. CBTO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSK | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.42% | 12.03% | +60.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.90% | 12.03% | +59.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.90% | 12.03% | +59.87% |
SSK vs. CBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSK vs. CBTO - Dividend Comparison
SSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.51%, more than CBTO's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.24% | 0.22% |
SSK REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF | 31.51% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSK and CBTO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SSK.
SSK has the higher dividend yield at 31.51%, compared with 0.24% for CBTO.
SSK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBTO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: REX-Osprey and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SSK and 0.69% for CBTO.
Find the right allocation for SSK and CBTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer