PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSHQX vs. SSCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX) and State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SSHQX having a 10.20% return and SSCNX slightly lower at 10.08%. Over the past 10 years, SSHQX has underperformed SSCNX with an annualized return of -10.86%, while SSCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.26% annualized return.


SSHQX

1D
0.43%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.20%
6M
12.92%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
-10.86%

SSCNX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.29%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.69%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
10.20%23.42%13.71%19.74%-4.73%19.32%-89.75%24.83%-9.27%16.85%
SSCNX
State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund
10.08%19.00%11.21%17.68%-18.55%11.75%18.72%24.61%-7.45%18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SSHQX and SSCNX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.80

The correlation between SSHQX and SSCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSHQX vs. SSCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSHQX
SSHQX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SSHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCNX
SSCNX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SSCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX) and State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSHQXSSCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.07

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

13.19

-2.53

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSHQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SSCNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSHQX and SSCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSHQXSSCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.54

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.61

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.34

0.76

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.69

-1.03

Drawdowns

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSHQX drawdown since its inception was -92.12%, which is greater than SSCNX's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHQX and SSCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSHQXSSCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.12%

-27.49%

-64.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-7.96%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-12.72%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-26.14%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.12%

-27.49%

-64.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.98%

0.00%

-78.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.29%

-4.77%

-47.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.85%

+0.47%

Volatility

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX) at 3.08%. This indicates that SSHQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSHQXSSCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.08%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

7.75%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

9.63%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

12.73%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.24%

13.47%

+18.77%

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSHQX and SSCNX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSHQX vs. SSCNX - Dividend Comparison

SSHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than SSCNX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCNX
State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.55%7.21%4.97%3.78%5.39%5.58%4.63%6.31%5.11%0.38%1.77%1.96%
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
3.27%3.60%3.11%3.77%22.27%2.93%2.03%5.14%7.33%3.12%4.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSHQX and SSCNX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSHQX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SSCNX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSHQX dropped -92.12% vs SSCNX's -27.49%.

SSCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSHQX and SSCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer