PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSGVX vs. CIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S.Index Portfolio (SSGVX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSGVX achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 34.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SSGVX has outperformed CIGIX with an annualized return of 38.32%, while CIGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


SSGVX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.89%
YTD
14.99%
6M
18.12%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
38.32%

CIGIX

1D
0.26%
1M
13.78%
YTD
34.54%
6M
37.88%
1Y
48.17%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSGVX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S.Index Portfolio
14.99%32.69%5.01%15.71%-16.42%8.42%1,010.40%21.71%-14.01%27.18%
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
34.54%23.11%12.51%15.33%-30.54%-8.98%44.95%29.69%-20.93%39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SSGVX and CIGIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.84

The correlation between SSGVX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSGVX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSGVX
SSGVX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SSGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S.Index Portfolio (SSGVX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSGVXCIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.01

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

11.14

+0.11

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSGVX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSGVXCIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.09

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.23

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.53

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.38

-0.26

Drawdowns

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSGVX drawdown since its inception was -35.79%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSGVX and CIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSGVXCIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.79%

-64.46%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-15.88%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-19.38%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-50.15%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-50.15%

+14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-15.29%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

4.28%

-1.40%

Volatility

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S.Index Portfolio (SSGVX) is 4.55%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that SSGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSGVXCIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

9.54%

-4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

19.73%

-8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

22.82%

-9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

21.07%

-6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

282.29%

19.98%

+262.31%

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSGVX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSGVX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

SSGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than CIGIX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
10.02%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
SSGVX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S.Index Portfolio
2.89%3.33%3.09%2.96%2.35%2.58%1.66%2.96%3.02%2.77%1.56%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSGVX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to SSGVX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSGVX dropped -35.79% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

SSGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSGVX and CIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer