PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSGLX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SSGLX having a 14.98% return and UCEQX slightly lower at 14.50%. Over the past 10 years, SSGLX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.


SSGLX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.89%
YTD
14.98%
6M
18.09%
1Y
32.74%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
9.82%

UCEQX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.13%
YTD
14.50%
6M
15.24%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSGLX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K
14.98%32.64%4.98%15.67%-16.44%8.36%11.11%21.52%-14.05%27.12%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
14.50%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SSGLX and UCEQX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.83

The correlation between SSGLX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSGLX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSGLX
SSGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SSGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSGLXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.61

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

16.19

-4.96

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSGLX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSGLXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.64

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.74

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.71

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Drawdowns

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSGLX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, roughly equal to the maximum UCEQX drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSGLX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSGLXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-35.33%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-8.96%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-15.64%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.08%

-25.24%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.88%

-35.33%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-4.87%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.99%

+0.89%

Volatility

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 3.67%. This indicates that SSGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSGLXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

3.67%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

9.71%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

12.25%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

15.27%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.50%

-0.26%

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSGLX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSGLX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

SSGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than UCEQX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSGLX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K
3.84%4.41%4.46%2.98%2.85%4.20%1.72%4.80%8.32%3.98%1.52%2.09%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.43%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSGLX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSGLX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to UCEQX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSGLX dropped -35.88% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSGLX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer