PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFI vs. BESF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFI vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFI achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 14.96% return.


SSFI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.85%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
10Y*

BESF

1D
1.49%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
14.96%
6M
14.44%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFI vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSFI and BESF is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFI vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFI
SSFI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SSFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BESF
BESF Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFI vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSFIBESFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

5.14

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

14.33

-9.62

SSFI vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFI and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSFI vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFI drawdown since its inception was -16.07%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFI and BESF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFIBESFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.07%

-10.97%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-10.97%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-9.64%

+7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-2.72%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

3.93%

-3.07%

Volatility

SSFI vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) is 1.21%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SSFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFIBESFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

6.87%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

14.94%

-12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

24.78%

-20.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

24.42%

-18.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

24.42%

-18.67%

SSFI vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFI has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSFI vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

SSFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BESF's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
5.92%6.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSFI
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
3.36%3.51%3.64%3.97%1.87%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSFI and BESF have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BESF has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SSFI (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFI dropped -16.07% vs BESF's -10.97%.

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 56.15% vs 4.04% for SSFI. On fees, BESF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, SSFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 56.15% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BESF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSFI.

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.36% for SSFI.

SSFI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSFI and 0.80% for BESF.

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFI and BESF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer