PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFDX vs. TCPYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFDX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than TCPYX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFDX has underperformed TCPYX with an annualized return of -19.41%, while TCPYX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.55% annualized return.


SSFDX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.41%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
-19.41%

TCPYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.37%6.80%1.36%5.39%-13.36%-1.98%-89.24%8.98%-0.20%3.29%
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
0.31%6.75%1.77%5.32%-13.07%-1.01%6.72%7.91%0.16%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SSFDX and TCPYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.93

The correlation between SSFDX and TCPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFDX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFDX
SSFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SSFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TCPYX
TCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSFDXTCPYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.92

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.76

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

5.37

+0.48

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the TCPYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFDX and TCPYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSFDXTCPYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.00

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.61

0.32

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.69

-1.24

Drawdowns

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFDX drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than TCPYX's maximum drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFDX and TCPYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFDXTCPYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.69%

-18.12%

-74.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.92%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-5.79%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-18.12%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.69%

-18.12%

-74.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.13%

-2.20%

-87.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-3.22%

-44.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.96%

-0.06%

Volatility

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) is 1.30%, while Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that SSFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFDXTCPYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.47%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.83%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

3.98%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

5.90%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.82%

4.85%

+26.97%

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFDX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSFDX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison

SSFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than TCPYX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.06%3.64%3.59%2.95%2.27%3.12%8.84%3.15%2.79%2.43%2.19%4.63%
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
3.94%3.52%3.68%3.22%2.63%1.91%2.13%2.63%2.86%2.77%2.98%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SSFDX and TCPYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCPYX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to SSFDX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFDX dropped -92.69% vs TCPYX's -18.12%.

SSFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFDX and TCPYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer