PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFDX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than SSBWX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFDX has underperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 1.45%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.01% annualized return.


SSFDX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.45%

SSBWX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.08%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.44%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.62%6.80%1.36%5.39%-13.36%-1.98%7.57%8.98%-0.20%3.29%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.60%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SSFDX and SSBWX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.14

Over the past year, SSFDX and SSBWX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFDX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFDX
SSFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SSFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSFDXSSBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.94

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

12.78

-7.75

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFDX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFDX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than SSBWX's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFDX and SSBWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFDXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-23.73%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-6.20%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-9.73%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-23.73%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

-23.73%

-3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-0.33%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.15%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.42%

-0.46%

Volatility

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) is 1.14%, while State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that SSFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFDXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.21%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

6.56%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

7.89%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

10.71%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

11.35%

+2.76%

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFDX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSFDX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

SSFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than SSBWX's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.42%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.10%3.64%3.59%2.95%2.27%3.12%3.00%3.15%2.79%2.43%2.19%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSFDX and SSBWX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSBWX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to SSFDX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFDX dropped -26.93% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFDX and SSBWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer