PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSEYX vs. SEECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SSEYX having a 10.88% return and SEECX slightly lower at 10.65%. Over the past 10 years, SSEYX has outperformed SEECX with an annualized return of 15.49%, while SEECX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.


SSEYX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.51%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%

SEECX

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.40%
YTD
10.65%
6M
10.48%
1Y
26.12%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
10.88%17.52%25.01%26.29%-18.18%28.58%18.28%31.42%-4.54%21.72%
SEECX
Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
10.65%16.88%23.50%25.34%-19.71%30.59%12.83%29.49%-6.99%21.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SSEYX and SEECX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.99

The correlation between SSEYX and SEECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSEYX vs. SEECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSEYX
SSEYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SSEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SEECX
SEECX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEECX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SEECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEECX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSEYXSEECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.88

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

12.99

+1.64

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSEYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SEECX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSEYX and SEECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSEYXSEECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.52

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.61

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.48

+0.31

Drawdowns

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSEYX drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, smaller than the maximum SEECX drawdown of -58.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSEYX and SEECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSEYXSEECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-58.09%

+24.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-9.11%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-18.72%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-42.66%

+18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

-42.66%

+8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.74%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-9.64%

+5.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.02%

-0.12%

Volatility

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSEYXSEECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.95%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

9.03%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

11.93%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

25.52%

-8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

22.96%

-4.90%

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSEYX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SEECX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSEYX vs. SEECX - Dividend Comparison

SSEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than SEECX's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEECX
Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
3.26%3.61%8.47%3.77%50.97%32.80%9.47%2.23%5.64%1.18%0.94%18.68%
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
1.25%1.38%1.93%1.46%1.57%2.48%3.63%2.36%5.91%5.37%2.29%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SSEYX and SEECX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEECX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SSEYX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSEYX dropped -33.75% vs SEECX's -58.09%.

SSEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSEYX and SEECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer