PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSDAX vs. RFIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Small Cap Growth Fund (SSDAX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSDAX achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 15.87% return.


SSDAX

1D
1.11%
1M
3.22%
YTD
14.10%
6M
12.94%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
8.13%

RFIMX

1D
1.19%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.87%
6M
13.94%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SSDAX
DWS Small Cap Growth Fund
14.10%8.60%5.94%14.61%-26.05%12.53%27.31%20.87%-1.13%
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
15.87%1.99%11.52%9.14%-24.26%30.58%44.44%24.94%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SSDAX and RFIMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018

0.88

The correlation between SSDAX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSDAX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSDAX
SSDAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SSDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SSDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

RFIMX
RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Small Cap Growth Fund (SSDAX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSDAXRFIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.20

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

9.02

-0.37

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the RFIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSDAX and RFIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSDAXRFIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.53

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.00

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.00

+0.31

Drawdowns

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSDAX drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSDAX and RFIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSDAXRFIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-99.41%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-9.11%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-99.41%

+74.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.45%

-99.41%

+63.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-99.12%

+98.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-29.26%

+16.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

3.23%

+0.39%

Volatility

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Small Cap Growth Fund (SSDAX) is 5.28%, while Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that SSDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSDAXRFIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.79%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

13.68%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

19.11%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

5,369.96%

-5,348.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

4,402.70%

-4,380.71%

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSDAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSDAX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison

SSDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than RFIMX's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
1.14%1.33%0.00%0.77%47.82%71.79%0.00%0.00%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSDAX
DWS Small Cap Growth Fund
3.97%4.53%2.55%0.83%0.39%10.30%0.00%0.00%23.84%4.34%0.00%6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSDAX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFIMX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to SSDAX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSDAX dropped -66.10% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.

SSDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSDAX and RFIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer