SSCPX vs. MSSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX).
SSCPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994. MSSCX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Sep 24, 1997.
Performance
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | -2.63% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -16.14% | 15.58% |
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund | -1.27% | 7.63% | 10.88% | 23.41% | -21.47% | 16.33% | 39.13% | 46.03% | 2.22% | 21.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCPX achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than MSSCX's -1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX has underperformed MSSCX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while MSSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.
SSCPX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
MSSCX
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MSSCX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSCPX vs. MSSCX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCPX
MSSCX
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCPX | MSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.78 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 3.48 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCPX | MSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.78 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.33 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCPX and MSSCX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Dividend Comparison
SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.26%, while MSSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 9.26% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.23% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 43.52% | 3.34% | 17.24% | 59.21% | 27.92% | 0.43% | 28.21% |
Drawdowns
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum MSSCX drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and MSSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCPX | MSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.65% | -78.46% | +24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -15.52% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.78% | -33.02% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -46.70% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.54% | -10.80% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -28.37% | +18.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 4.62% | -0.96% |
Volatility
SSCPX vs. MSSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) is 7.50%, while AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that SSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSCPX | MSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 8.64% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 19.69% | -4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 29.66% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 26.14% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 26.32% | -3.42% |