PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCJX vs. SSHQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCJX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than SSHQX's 10.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCJX has outperformed SSHQX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while SSHQX has yielded a comparatively lower -10.86% annualized return.


SSCJX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.91%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.74%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
9.72%

SSHQX

1D
0.43%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.20%
6M
12.92%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
-10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
9.21%17.89%10.46%16.73%-18.06%11.38%18.07%23.59%-6.86%17.41%
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
10.20%23.42%13.71%19.74%-4.73%19.32%-89.75%24.83%-9.27%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCJX and SSHQX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.79

The correlation between SSCJX and SSHQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCJX vs. SSHQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCJX
SSCJX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SSCJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHQX
SSHQX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SSHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCJXSSHQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.41

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.56

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

10.66

+2.63

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the SSHQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCJX and SSHQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCJXSSHQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.09

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.00

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

-0.34

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

-0.34

+1.05

Drawdowns

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCJX drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum SSHQX drawdown of -92.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCJX and SSHQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCJXSSHQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-92.12%

+66.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-9.69%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.55%

-13.99%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-14.79%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

-92.12%

+66.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-78.98%

+78.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-52.29%

+47.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.32%

-0.63%

Volatility

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) is 2.80%, while State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that SSCJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSHQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCJXSSHQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.49%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

9.73%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

11.84%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

13.42%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.49%

32.24%

-19.75%

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCJX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHQX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSCJX vs. SSHQX - Dividend Comparison

SSCJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than SSHQX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
6.34%6.92%5.44%4.03%5.32%5.43%4.54%6.46%4.99%0.55%1.74%2.03%
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
3.27%3.60%3.11%3.77%22.27%2.93%2.03%5.14%7.33%3.12%4.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCJX and SSHQX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSHQX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SSCJX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCJX dropped -25.66% vs SSHQX's -92.12%.

SSCJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCJX and SSHQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer