PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCJX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCJX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCJX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


SSCJX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.91%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.74%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
9.72%

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
9.21%17.89%10.46%16.73%-18.06%11.38%18.07%23.59%-6.86%17.41%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCJX and SSBRX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between SSCJX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCJX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCJX
SSCJX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SSCJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCJXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.58

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.58

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

16.33

-3.04

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCJX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCJXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.91

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.62

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Drawdowns

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCJX drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCJX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCJXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-21.96%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-4.44%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.55%

-7.48%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-21.13%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

-21.96%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.72%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

0.97%

+0.72%

Volatility

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.74%. This indicates that SSCJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCJXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.74%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

4.36%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

5.48%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

8.83%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.49%

9.82%

+2.67%

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCJX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSCJX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

SSCJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than SSBRX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
6.34%6.92%5.44%4.03%5.32%5.43%4.54%6.46%4.99%0.55%1.74%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SSCJX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSCJX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCJX dropped -25.66% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCJX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer