SSCDX vs. AFMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX).
SSCDX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015. AFMCX is managed by Acuitas Investments. It was launched on Jul 18, 2014.
Performance
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.52% | 12.90% | 15.50% | 15.50% | -17.15% | 23.46% | 16.21% | 27.12% | -17.10% | 13.69% |
AFMCX Acuitas US Microcap Fund | -1.58% | 13.54% | 8.32% | 17.41% | -19.11% | 29.20% | 14.07% | 21.89% | -13.26% | 10.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCDX achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly higher than AFMCX's -1.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSCDX having a 9.84% annualized return and AFMCX not far behind at 9.56%.
SSCDX
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
AFMCX
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCDX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AFMCX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSCDX vs. AFMCX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCDX
AFMCX
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCDX | AFMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.78 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.86 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 6.64 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCDX | AFMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.15 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.38 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCDX and AFMCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Dividend Comparison
SSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than AFMCX's 4.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 2.13% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 4.26% | 8.47% | 0.77% | 1.33% | 2.69% | 0.85% | 1.16% | 0.87% |
AFMCX Acuitas US Microcap Fund | 4.82% | 4.74% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 8.34% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 28.38% | 3.58% | 0.92% | 6.58% |
Drawdowns
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCDX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum AFMCX drawdown of -51.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCDX and AFMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCDX | AFMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -51.65% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -14.39% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.06% | -31.09% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.79% | -51.65% | +12.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.22% | -10.25% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -10.29% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 4.04% | -1.00% |
Volatility
SSCDX vs. AFMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) is 5.97%, while Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that SSCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSCDX | AFMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 7.04% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 15.77% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 25.32% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 23.54% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 23.87% | -3.25% |