PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSBRX vs. JLKUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSBRX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than JLKUX's 13.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SSBRX has underperformed JLKUX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while JLKUX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.


SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%

JLKUX

1D
0.33%
1M
5.66%
YTD
13.44%
6M
9.07%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
13.44%12.97%15.52%18.68%-19.64%15.82%20.34%24.86%-8.96%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SSBRX and JLKUX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.92

The correlation between SSBRX and JLKUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSBRX vs. JLKUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKUX
JLKUX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JLKUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSBRXJLKUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.35

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.65

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

10.34

+5.99

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the JLKUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSBRX and JLKUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSBRXJLKUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.87

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.51

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.60

+0.14

Drawdowns

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSBRX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum JLKUX drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSBRX and JLKUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSBRXJLKUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-32.07%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-9.86%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-16.88%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-28.12%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

-32.07%

+10.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-5.30%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.39%

-1.42%

Volatility

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) is 1.74%, while John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that SSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSBRXJLKUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

3.86%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

11.70%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

13.99%

-8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

16.21%

-7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

16.51%

-6.69%

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSBRX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKUX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSBRX vs. JLKUX - Dividend Comparison

SSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than JLKUX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
1.65%1.87%3.23%3.28%15.00%9.92%4.36%8.74%11.46%3.34%4.83%2.95%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSBRX and JLKUX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLKUX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSBRX dropped -21.96% vs JLKUX's -32.07%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSBRX and JLKUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer