SSASX vs. TIBDX
SSASX (State Street Income Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, SSASX returned -0.64%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TIBDX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SSASX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSASX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSASX State Street Income Fund | -0.00% | 7.49% | -0.95% | 4.83% | -13.74% | 0.59% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.67% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSASX and TIBDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SSASX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSASX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
SSASX
TIBDX
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Income Fund (SSASX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSASX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.04 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 6.36 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSASX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.56 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.05 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.95 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSASX drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSASX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSASX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -18.82% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -2.98% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.97% | -6.29% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -18.82% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -1.22% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -2.30% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 0.95% | +0.19% |
Volatility
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
State Street Income Fund (SSASX) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 1.39%. This indicates that SSASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSASX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.39% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 2.88% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 3.90% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 5.63% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 4.73% | +1.76% |
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSASX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSASX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
SSASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than TIBDX's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSASX State Street Income Fund | 4.00% | 4.01% | 2.76% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.45% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SSASX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSASX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to TIBDX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSASX dropped -19.65% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSASX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer