SSASX vs. EBABX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSASX (State Street Income Fund) and EBABX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, SSASX returned -0.64%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for EBABX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSASX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for EBABX.

Performance

SSASX vs. EBABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Income Fund (SSASX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSASX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: -0.08%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: -0.64%
• 10Y*: —

EBABX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 5.78%
• 5Y*: 1.17%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSASX vs. EBABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SSASX State Street Income Fund	-0.00%	7.49%	-0.95%	4.83%	-13.74%	0.59%
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	0.41%	8.87%	4.21%	5.30%	-13.08%	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SSASX and EBABX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021	0.95

The correlation between SSASX and EBABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSASX vs. EBABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSASX

SSASX Risk / Return Rank: 18
SSASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SSASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SSASX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SSASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SSASX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

EBABX

EBABX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EBABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EBABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EBABX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
EBABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EBABX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSASX vs. EBABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Income Fund (SSASX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSASX	EBABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.57	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.36	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.90	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	5.85	-1.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSASX vs. EBABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the EBABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSASX and EBABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSASX	EBABX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.57	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.22	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.77	-0.87

Drawdowns

SSASX vs. EBABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSASX drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, which is greater than EBABX's maximum drawdown of -17.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSASX and EBABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSASX	EBABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-17.19%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-3.27%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.97%	-5.68%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.65%	-17.19%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.26%	-1.47%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-3.65%	-6.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	1.06%	+0.08%

Volatility

SSASX vs. EBABX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Income Fund (SSASX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) have volatilities of 1.46% and 1.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSASX	EBABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	1.52%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	2.96%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22%	3.95%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.49%	5.31%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.49%	4.68%	+1.81%

SSASX vs. EBABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSASX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EBABX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSASX vs. EBABX - Dividend Comparison

SSASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than EBABX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	4.88%	4.89%	5.31%	3.83%	3.77%	3.23%	3.64%	3.71%	3.89%	3.29%	3.66%	5.41%
SSASX State Street Income Fund	4.00%	4.01%	2.76%	2.86%	2.48%	3.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSASX and EBABX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SSASX and EBABX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SSASX or EBABX?

EBABX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to SSASX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSASX dropped -19.65% vs EBABX's -17.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.