PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSAQX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAQX achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 14.10% return.


SSAQX

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.86%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*

RCKSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.42%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
8.01%17.43%5.04%28.87%-18.27%12.02%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.10%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAQX and RCKSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.78

The correlation between SSAQX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSAQX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAQX
SSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSAQXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

5.11

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

14.18

-3.56

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAQX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSAQXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.83

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAQX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAQX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSAQXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-57.88%

+26.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-4.14%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.70%

-18.22%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.70%

-22.54%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.60%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-9.51%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.49%

+1.00%

Volatility

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSAQXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.94%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.06%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

11.56%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

15.66%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

17.55%

+1.31%

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAQX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSAQX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

SSAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.48%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
11.13%12.02%0.00%3.83%9.83%13.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSAQX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSAQX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to RCKSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSAQX dropped -31.70% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

SSAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAQX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer