PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.

Performance

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.

SSAC.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.64%

XDEB.L

1D
0.39%
1M
1.39%
YTD
0.89%
6M
0.64%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)		11.92%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%22.09%-4.79%13.30%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		0.89%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and XDEB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between SSAC.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SSAC.L
XDEB.L

Technology

31.1%
20.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
14.0%

Industrials

10.4%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.6%

Communication Services

8.9%
12.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
10.9%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.1%

Utilities

2.4%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.7%

Technology

SSAC.L
31.1%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Financial Services

SSAC.L
15.7%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Industrials

SSAC.L
10.4%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SSAC.L
9.1%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Communication Services

SSAC.L
8.9%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Healthcare

SSAC.L
8.0%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

SSAC.L
5.0%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Energy

SSAC.L
4.2%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

SSAC.L
3.6%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Utilities

SSAC.L
2.4%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Real Estate

SSAC.L
1.7%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with SSAC.L:
SSAC.L vs. ACWISSAC.L vs. VWRP.LSSAC.L vs. ISAC.LSSAC.L vs. SWDA.LSSAC.L vs. IUSQ.DESSAC.L vs. ACWI.LSSAC.L vs. VWRL.AS
Often compared with XDEB.L:
XDEB.L vs. MVUS.LXDEB.L vs. XDEM.LXDEB.L vs. SWDA.LXDEB.L vs. XDEQ.LXDEB.L vs. VWRA.LXDEB.L vs. VHYL.ASXDEB.L vs. AVGC.L

Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SSAC.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
0.31

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.96
0.50

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.06

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

0.38

+3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

1.05

+16.37

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SSAC.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.31

+2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.65

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.70

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.78

+0.12

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and XDEB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SSAC.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-19.61%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-6.39%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-8.47%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-10.19%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-19.61%

-5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-3.67%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.50%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.31%

-0.57%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that SSAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SSAC.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.68%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

5.97%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

7.97%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

9.68%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

11.52%

+2.86%

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SSAC.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

SSAC.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer