SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for X7PP.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
X7PP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 42.34%
- 5Y*
- 27.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.92% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 4.75% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and X7PP.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
Industrials
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Communication Services
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Real Estate
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
X7PP.L
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.32 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 2.60 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 8.72 | +8.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.91 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.61 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.42 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -56.28% | +30.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -15.94% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.99% | -18.17% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.99% | -30.79% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -56.28% | +30.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -2.08% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -15.39% | +11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 4.77% | -3.03% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 6.65% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 17.81% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 21.78% | -11.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 23.48% | -10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 24.63% | -10.25% |
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SSAC.L and X7PP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSAC.L and X7PP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer