PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return.


SSAC.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.64%

X7PP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
3.62%
YTD
4.75%
6M
12.08%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
42.34%
5Y*
27.33%
10Y*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
11.92%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%22.09%-4.79%13.30%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
4.75%87.77%27.07%23.27%6.04%29.16%-18.50%8.33%-25.45%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and X7PP.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.57

The correlation between SSAC.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSAC.L
X7PP.L

Technology

31.1%

-

Financial Services

15.7%
100.0%

Industrials

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%

-

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

SSAC.L
31.1%
X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

SSAC.L
15.7%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Industrials

SSAC.L
10.4%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SSAC.L
9.1%
X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

SSAC.L
8.9%
X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

SSAC.L
8.0%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SSAC.L
5.0%
X7PP.L

-

Energy

SSAC.L
4.2%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

SSAC.L
3.6%
X7PP.L

-

Utilities

SSAC.L
2.4%
X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

SSAC.L
1.7%
X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSAC.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.32

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

2.60

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

8.72

+8.70

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSAC.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

1.91

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.16

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.61

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.42

+0.48

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSAC.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-56.28%

+30.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-15.94%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-18.17%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-30.79%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-56.28%

+30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-2.08%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-15.39%

+11.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

4.77%

-3.03%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSAC.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

6.65%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

17.81%

-10.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

21.78%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

23.48%

-10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

24.63%

-10.25%

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSAC.L and X7PP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSAC.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SSAC.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSAC.L and X7PP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer