SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSAC.L returned 12.18%/yr vs 14.39%/yr for VUAG.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAG.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than VUAG.L's 8.79% return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.60% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 12.19% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 8.79% | 9.36% | 27.34% | 19.65% | -8.87% | 30.97% | 16.23% | -12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and VUAG.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and VUAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Industrials
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Communication Services
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Healthcare
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Energy
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Utilities
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Real Estate
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
VUAG.L
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSAC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.66 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 13.20 | +2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and VUAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -30.82% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -7.11% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.01% | -20.88% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -20.88% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.82% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -5.47% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.98% | -0.20% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.57% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 7.56% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 10.90% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 14.36% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.88% | -0.60% |
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SSAC.L and VUAG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSAC.L.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.07% for VUAG.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and VUAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer