SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSAC.L returned 12.59%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VUAA.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while VUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than VUAA.L's 10.72% return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VUAA.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.92% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 8.11% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.72% | 9.01% | 27.46% | 20.35% | -8.96% | 30.57% | 14.21% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and VUAA.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and VUAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Industrials
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Communication Services
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Healthcare
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Energy
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Utilities
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Real Estate
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
VUAA.L
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.45 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 4.02 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 13.58 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.43 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VUAA.L drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -26.15% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -7.23% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.99% | -21.12% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.99% | -21.12% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.28% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.69% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.14% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 3.51% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 8.64% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 12.01% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 15.41% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 17.14% | -2.76% |
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSAC.L.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer