PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and MVOL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS) are both Global Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for MVOL.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MVOL.L.

Performance

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while MVOL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MVOL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has outperformed MVOL.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while MVOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.

SSAC.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.64%

MVOL.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.04%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.86%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)		11.92%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%22.09%-4.79%13.30%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS		1.00%3.11%13.02%1.92%1.12%15.73%-0.45%17.90%3.39%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and MVOL.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between SSAC.L and MVOL.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SSAC.L
MVOL.L

Technology

31.1%
20.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
14.0%

Industrials

10.4%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.6%

Communication Services

8.9%
12.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
10.9%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.1%

Utilities

2.4%
8.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.7%

Technology

SSAC.L
31.1%
MVOL.L
20.1%

Financial Services

SSAC.L
15.7%
MVOL.L
14.0%

Industrials

SSAC.L
10.4%
MVOL.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SSAC.L
9.1%
MVOL.L
5.6%

Communication Services

SSAC.L
8.9%
MVOL.L
12.1%

Healthcare

SSAC.L
8.0%
MVOL.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

SSAC.L
5.0%
MVOL.L
10.9%

Energy

SSAC.L
4.2%
MVOL.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

SSAC.L
3.6%
MVOL.L
1.1%

Utilities

SSAC.L
2.4%
MVOL.L
8.0%

Real Estate

SSAC.L
1.7%
MVOL.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS

Often compared with SSAC.L:
SSAC.L vs. ACWISSAC.L vs. VWRP.LSSAC.L vs. ISAC.LSSAC.L vs. SWDA.LSSAC.L vs. IUSQ.DESSAC.L vs. ACWI.LSSAC.L vs. VWRL.AS
Often compared with MVOL.L:
MVOL.L vs. ACWVMVOL.L vs. IWDA.LMVOL.L vs. XDEB.DEMVOL.L vs. VOOMVOL.L vs. XDEM.LMVOL.L vs. USMVMVOL.L vs. SLXX.L

Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SSAC.LMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
0.28

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.96
0.45

+3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.05

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

0.42

+3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

1.08

+16.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SSAC.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.28

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.59

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.64

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.79

+0.11

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than MVOL.L's maximum drawdown of -20.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and MVOL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SSAC.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-20.24%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-5.89%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-8.78%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-10.44%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-20.24%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-3.49%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.64%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.27%

-0.53%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) have volatilities of 2.89% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SSAC.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.95%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

6.88%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

8.81%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

10.63%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

12.50%

+1.88%

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSAC.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

SSAC.L and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer