SSAC.L vs. IITU.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 27.67%/yr for IITU.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 25.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.67% annualized return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 25.87%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 56.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.15%
- 5Y*
- 26.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.92% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 25.87% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and IITU.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SSAC.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
SSAC.L
IITU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SSAC.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SSAC.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
IITU.L
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.48 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 3.38 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 8.71 | +8.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.91 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.19 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.24 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -28.03% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -16.76% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.99% | -28.03% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.99% | -28.03% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -28.03% | +2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.83% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -5.14% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 6.51% | -4.77% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 6.45% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 14.27% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 19.57% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 21.93% | -8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 21.31% | -6.93% |
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSAC.L.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer