PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while FLXI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLXI.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than FLXI.DE's -11.07% return.


SSAC.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.64%

FLXI.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-11.07%
6M
-11.02%
1Y
-10.52%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
11.92%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%5.26%
FLXI.DE
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-11.07%-3.97%11.87%14.92%3.59%25.93%7.64%-3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and FLXI.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.49

The correlation between SSAC.L and FLXI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXI.DE
FLXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSAC.LFLXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.89

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

-0.59

+4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

-1.33

+18.75

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and FLXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSAC.LFLXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

-0.72

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.33

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.30

+0.60

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum FLXI.DE drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and FLXI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSAC.LFLXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-36.64%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-17.66%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-22.11%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-22.11%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-19.79%

+19.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-7.18%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

7.87%

-6.13%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSAC.LFLXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

5.74%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

12.17%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

14.48%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

15.70%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

19.55%

-5.17%

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXI.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSAC.L vs. FLXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor FLXI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SSAC.L and FLXI.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSAC.L.

SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FLXI.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.19% for FLXI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and FLXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer