PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and EMSM.L (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EMSM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for EMSM.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EMSM.L.

Performance

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while EMSM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMSM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly lower than EMSM.L's 15.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has outperformed EMSM.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while EMSM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.

SSAC.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.64%

EMSM.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
2.41%
YTD
15.36%
6M
15.54%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)		11.92%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%22.09%-4.79%13.30%
EMSM.L
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF		15.36%12.15%4.60%15.48%-7.03%17.67%16.12%5.70%-13.10%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and EMSM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2011

0.70

The correlation between SSAC.L and EMSM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SSAC.L
EMSM.L

Technology

31.1%
22.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
11.1%

Industrials

10.4%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.8%

Communication Services

8.9%
2.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.3%

Energy

4.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
9.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
6.0%

Technology

SSAC.L
31.1%
EMSM.L
22.6%

Financial Services

SSAC.L
15.7%
EMSM.L
11.1%

Industrials

SSAC.L
10.4%
EMSM.L
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SSAC.L
9.1%
EMSM.L
9.8%

Communication Services

SSAC.L
8.9%
EMSM.L
2.9%

Healthcare

SSAC.L
8.0%
EMSM.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

SSAC.L
5.0%
EMSM.L
5.3%

Energy

SSAC.L
4.2%
EMSM.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

SSAC.L
3.6%
EMSM.L
9.5%

Utilities

SSAC.L
2.4%
EMSM.L
2.7%

Real Estate

SSAC.L
1.7%
EMSM.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF

Often compared with SSAC.L:
SSAC.L vs. ACWISSAC.L vs. VWRP.LSSAC.L vs. ISAC.LSSAC.L vs. SWDA.LSSAC.L vs. IUSQ.DESSAC.L vs. ACWI.LSSAC.L vs. VWRL.AS
Often compared with EMSM.L:
EMSM.L vs. IEMS.LEMSM.L vs. USSC.LEMSM.L vs. ACWIEMSM.L vs. WLDS.LEMSM.L vs. VWRP.LEMSM.L vs. SPYI.DEEMSM.L vs. GLD

Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
EMSM.L
EMSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SSAC.LEMSM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
2.01

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.96
2.74

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.37

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

3.28

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

10.59

+6.83

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the EMSM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and EMSM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SSAC.LEMSM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.01

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.62

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.63

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.45

+0.44

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum EMSM.L drawdown of -37.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and EMSM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SSAC.LEMSM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-37.81%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-9.43%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-20.07%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-20.07%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-37.81%

+12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-2.11%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-7.93%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.93%

-1.19%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.L) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SSAC.LEMSM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

6.30%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

13.11%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

15.45%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

13.82%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

16.39%

-2.01%

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMSM.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSAC.L vs. EMSM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor EMSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

SSAC.L and EMSM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMSM.L.

SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EMSM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EMSM.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.55% for EMSM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and EMSM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer