SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANRJ.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.35%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for ANRJ.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than ANRJ.L's 25.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 13.35%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 25.39%
- 6M
- 22.30%
- 1Y
- 64.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.68%
- 5Y*
- 28.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.81%
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.62% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.76% | 13.26% |
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 25.39% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | -27.94% | 3.65% | 0.61% | 9.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and ANRJ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Industrials
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Communication Services
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Healthcare
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Energy
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Utilities
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
Real Estate
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 7.31 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.30 | 22.77 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 3.45 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.31 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum ANRJ.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and ANRJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -57.08% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -8.76% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.01% | -13.17% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -19.81% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -57.08% | +31.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -5.21% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -13.73% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.82% | -1.08% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.91%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 6.72% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 13.65% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 18.60% | -8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 21.56% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 24.71% | -7.44% |
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and ANRJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer