PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than ANRJ.L's 25.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 13.35%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.


SSAC.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.63%
YTD
10.62%
6M
10.60%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
13.35%

ANRJ.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
25.39%
6M
22.30%
1Y
64.38%
3Y*
32.68%
5Y*
28.33%
10Y*
15.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.62%13.95%19.63%16.14%-8.56%20.35%11.80%22.09%-4.76%13.26%
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
25.39%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%3.65%0.61%9.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and ANRJ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011

0.57

The correlation between SSAC.L and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSAC.L
ANRJ.L

Technology

31.1%
1.4%

Financial Services

15.7%

-

Industrials

10.4%
44.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.9%

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%
25.7%

Utilities

2.4%
20.6%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

SSAC.L
31.1%
ANRJ.L
1.4%

Financial Services

SSAC.L
15.7%
ANRJ.L

-

Industrials

SSAC.L
10.4%
ANRJ.L
44.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SSAC.L
9.1%
ANRJ.L
7.9%

Communication Services

SSAC.L
8.9%
ANRJ.L

-

Healthcare

SSAC.L
8.0%
ANRJ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SSAC.L
5.0%
ANRJ.L

-

Energy

SSAC.L
4.2%
ANRJ.L

-

Basic Materials

SSAC.L
3.6%
ANRJ.L
25.7%

Utilities

SSAC.L
2.4%
ANRJ.L
20.6%

Real Estate

SSAC.L
1.7%
ANRJ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAC.L
SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSAC.LANRJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.55

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

7.31

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.30

22.77

-6.48

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and ANRJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSAC.LANRJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

3.45

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.31

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.64

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.39

+0.08

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum ANRJ.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and ANRJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSAC.LANRJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-57.08%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-8.76%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.01%

-13.17%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-19.81%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-57.08%

+31.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-5.21%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-13.73%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.82%

-1.08%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.91%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSAC.LANRJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

6.72%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

13.65%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

18.60%

-8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

21.56%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

24.71%

-7.44%

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSAC.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SSAC.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and ANRJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer