PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRVR vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRVR vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.86% return.


SRVR

1D
0.42%
1M
0.10%
YTD
18.64%
6M
17.26%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.90%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRVR vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
18.64%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.66%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and SLV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.24

The correlation between SRVR and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRVR vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRVR vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRVRSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.29

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.89

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

4.10

-2.93

SRVR vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRVRSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-76.28%

+35.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-45.40%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-45.40%

+27.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

-45.40%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-41.96%

+28.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-44.66%

+29.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

20.88%

-13.99%

Volatility

SRVR vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) is 6.23%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that SRVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRVRSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

16.34%

-10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

59.10%

-45.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

59.82%

-42.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

36.46%

-16.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

32.00%

-10.54%

SRVR vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRVR vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.57%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRVR and SLV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to SRVR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 18.83% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 18.83% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SRVR is categorized as REIT, while SLV is Silver. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRVR and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer