SRVR vs. FXU
SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) and FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while FXU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -1.65%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for FXU. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRVR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FXU.
Performance
SRVR vs. FXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than FXU's 8.19% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- —
FXU
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
SRVR vs. FXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 18.64% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 8.19% | 21.86% | 22.50% | -2.12% | 3.68% | 17.67% | 1.53% | 11.67% | 7.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and FXU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SRVR and FXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRVR vs. FXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRVR
FXU
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
SRVR
FXU
-
Industrials
SRVR
FXU
Communication Services
SRVR
FXU
-
Technology
SRVR
FXU
-
Energy
SRVR
FXU
Utilities
SRVR
FXU
Financial Services
SRVR
FXU
-
Basic Materials
SRVR
FXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRVR
-
FXU
-
Consumer Defensive
SRVR
-
FXU
-
Healthcare
SRVR
-
FXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. FXU — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
FXU
SRVR vs. FXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRVR | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 1.93 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 5.17 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. FXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum FXU drawdown of -49.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and FXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -49.00% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -8.63% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -17.46% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -21.87% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -5.57% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -7.63% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 3.22% | +3.67% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. FXU - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) at 5.01%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.01% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 10.33% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 13.30% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 16.61% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 18.34% | +3.12% |
SRVR vs. FXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXU's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. FXU - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than FXU's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.16% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.57% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and FXU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FXU (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs FXU's -49.00%.
On 5-year performance, FXU leads with 11.71% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXU has performed better with a 11.71% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.16% for FXU.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while FXU is Utilities Equities. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.62% for FXU.
FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and FXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer