SRVR vs. DFAR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. SRVR is passively managed, while DFAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SRVR returned 3.89%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for DFAR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SRVR charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.

Performance

SRVR vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 19.14% return.

SRVR

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -10.64%
• 6M: 0.07%
• YTD: 6.87%
• 1Y: -4.54%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: -3.67%
• 10Y*: —

DFAR

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 2.97%
• 6M: 15.37%
• YTD: 19.14%
• 1Y: 18.23%
• 3Y*: 10.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRVR vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	6.87%	-1.99%	2.70%	6.84%	-15.99%
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	19.14%	1.31%	5.25%	11.04%	-12.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and DFAR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between SRVR and DFAR has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SRVR vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 7
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 7

DFAR

DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 47
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRVR vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRVR	DFAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	1.32	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	1.85	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.23	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	2.17	-2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	6.83	-7.43

SRVR vs. DFAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the DFAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and DFAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and DFAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRVR	DFAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.99%	-32.27%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.98%	-8.43%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.34%	-17.64%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.75%	0.00%	-21.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.27%	-13.86%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.55%	2.67%	+4.88%

Volatility

SRVR vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is 4.22%, while Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that SRVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRVR	DFAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	5.18%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.02%	10.88%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	13.95%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	19.13%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	19.13%	+2.28%

SRVR vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRVR has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRVR vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than DFAR's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	2.60%	2.97%	2.89%	3.06%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	2.86%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRVR and DFAR in my portfolio?

SRVR and DFAR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRVR or DFAR?

DFAR has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to SRVR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs DFAR's -32.27%.

Which ETF is better, SRVR or DFAR?

On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 10.37% vs 3.89% for SRVR. On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SRVR or DFAR?

Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 10.37% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRVR or DFAR?

DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SRVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SRVR or DFAR?

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.60% for DFAR.

What is the main difference between SRVR and DFAR?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SRVR and 0.19% for DFAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.