SRVR vs. COWG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).
SRVR and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SRVR is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. It was launched on May 15, 2018. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. Both SRVR and COWG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SRVR vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SRVR vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 9.80% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | 0.42% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -4.15% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -4.15% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SRVR vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
COWG
SRVR vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRVR | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 2.44 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRVR | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and COWG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SRVR vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than COWG's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.95% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and COWG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -23.60% | -17.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -12.96% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.60% | -8.21% | -11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -3.35% | -12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 3.96% | +2.90% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) have volatilities of 6.07% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 6.09% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 13.24% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 22.50% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 19.34% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 19.34% | +2.14% |