SRUUF vs. FIFGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX).

SRUUF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jul 19, 2021. FIFGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2018.

Performance

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	3.76%	12.66%	-18.89%	82.09%	7.65%	17.26%
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused	40.42%	7.44%	6.34%	-11.90%	9.30%	5.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRUUF achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FIFGX's 40.42% return.

SRUUF

• 1D: 5.15%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 41.75%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIFGX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 22.58%
• YTD: 40.42%
• 6M: 39.86%
• 1Y: 40.86%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: 13.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRUUF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FIFGX's 0.39% expense ratio.

SRUUF

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund

FIFGX

Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused

Return for Risk

SRUUF vs. FIFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRUUF

SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 59
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FIFGX

FIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRUUF	FIFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.00	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	2.62	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.36	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	3.50	-1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	9.26	-4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRUUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the FIFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRUUF and FIFGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRUUF	FIFGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	2.00	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.03	+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between SRUUF and FIFGX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Dividend Comparison

SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused	3.87%	5.44%	4.73%	2.43%	12.64%	35.77%	3.10%	1.59%

Drawdowns

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRUUF drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum FIFGX drawdown of -92.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRUUF and FIFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRUUF	FIFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-92.38%	+43.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.98%	-12.22%	-10.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.39%	0.00%	-19.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.88%	-14.19%	-7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	4.63%	+4.62%

Volatility

SRUUF vs. FIFGX - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) at 10.69%. This indicates that SRUUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRUUF	FIFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.92%	10.69%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.44%	16.35%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.98%	21.61%	+16.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.29%	408.16%	-365.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.29%	338.61%	-296.32%