PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRTY vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRTY achieves a -40.40% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SRTY has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -43.65%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


SRTY

1D
4.15%
1M
-10.54%
YTD
-40.40%
6M
-38.33%
1Y
-65.58%
3Y*
-45.16%
5Y*
-30.75%
10Y*
-43.65%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRTY
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000
-40.40%-40.55%-32.91%-42.02%28.99%-51.67%-80.61%-53.83%23.37%-38.31%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SRTY and TQQQ is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.74

The correlation between SRTY and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRTY
TQQQ

Financial Services

86.7%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

SRTY
86.7%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

SRTY

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

SRTY

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SRTY

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

SRTY

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

SRTY

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

SRTY

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

SRTY

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

SRTY

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

SRTY

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

SRTY

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRTY vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRTY
SRTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRTYTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.15

2.92

-4.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.07

3.09

-5.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.40

-0.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

3.75

-4.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.50

12.27

-13.77

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRTY and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRTYTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

2.92

-4.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.43

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

0.69

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.69

0.74

-1.43

Drawdowns

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRTY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTY and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRTYTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-81.66%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.42%

-36.97%

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.56%

-58.04%

-30.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.18%

-81.66%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.74%

-81.66%

-18.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-0.76%

-99.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.78%

-18.52%

-75.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.59%

11.28%

+32.31%

Volatility

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) has a higher volatility of 17.30% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that SRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRTYTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.30%

13.29%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.81%

36.04%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.22%

47.60%

+9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

66.53%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.34%

65.96%

+2.38%

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SRTY and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SRTY vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRTY
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000
9.17%6.87%9.40%4.93%0.17%0.00%0.95%2.13%0.70%0.04%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRTY and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRTY has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTY dropped -100.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -43.65% for SRTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -43.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRTY and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SRTY has the higher dividend yield at 9.17%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

SRTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRTY and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer