SRTY vs. IWM
SRTY (ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRTY is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRTY returned -43.23%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for IWM. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. SRTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
SRTY vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTY achieves a -44.74% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SRTY has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of -43.23%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
SRTY
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -33.79%
- YTD
- -44.74%
- 1Y
- -61.69%
- 3Y*
- -43.41%
- 5Y*
- -32.96%
- 10Y*
- -43.23%
IWM
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
SRTY vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | -44.74% | -40.55% | -32.91% | -42.02% | 28.99% | -51.67% | -80.61% | -53.83% | 23.37% | -38.31% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.72% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTY and IWM is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -1.00 |
The correlation between SRTY and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SRTY vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRTY
IWM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SRTY
IWM
Basic Materials
SRTY
-
IWM
Communication Services
SRTY
-
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
SRTY
-
IWM
Consumer Defensive
SRTY
-
IWM
Energy
SRTY
-
IWM
Healthcare
SRTY
-
IWM
Industrials
SRTY
-
IWM
Real Estate
SRTY
-
IWM
Technology
SRTY
-
IWM
Utilities
SRTY
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTY vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
SRTY
IWM
SRTY vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRTY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.29 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 3.07 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 10.87 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRTY vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTY and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -59.05% | -40.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.43% | -11.03% | -56.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.67% | -27.50% | -62.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.04% | -31.91% | -60.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.70% | -41.13% | -58.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.32% | -97.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.16% | -10.73% | -83.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.75% | 3.11% | +40.64% |
Volatility
SRTY vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) has a higher volatility of 14.86% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 4.81%. This indicates that SRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.86% | 4.81% | +10.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.72% | 14.19% | +28.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.34% | 19.54% | +38.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.56% | 22.56% | +45.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.25% | 23.00% | +45.25% |
SRTY vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRTY vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
SRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, more than IWM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | 8.31% | 6.87% | 9.40% | 4.93% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.13% | 0.70% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTY and IWM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTY has higher volatility (14.86%) compared to IWM (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTY dropped -100.00% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.76% vs -43.23% for SRTY. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.76% return vs -43.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRTY.
SRTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.31%, compared with 0.91% for IWM.
SRTY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. SRTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRTY and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTY and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer