SRTS vs. SHV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 5 years, SRTS returned -5.16%/yr vs 3.40%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SRTS vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -24.25% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 1.84% return.

SRTS

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 11.25%
• 6M: -39.21%
• YTD: -24.25%
• 1Y: -30.37%
• 3Y*: -1.13%
• 5Y*: -5.16%
• 10Y*: —

SHV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 4.58%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 2.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRTS vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc.	-24.25%	-42.49%	193.22%	-68.19%	2.77%	87.05%	9.04%	-52.23%	43.60%	-1.71%
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	1.84%	4.21%	5.12%	5.04%	0.94%	-0.10%	0.81%	2.36%	1.72%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SRTS and SHV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2016	-0.03

Return for Risk

SRTS vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRTS

SRTS Risk / Return Rank: 27
SRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SHV

SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRTS vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRTS	SHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	18.17	-18.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	92.48	-92.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	30.49	-29.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	140.72	-141.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	1,495.85	-1,496.74

SRTS vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 18.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRTS and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRTS vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and SHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRTS	SHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.51%	-0.45%	-87.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.39%	-0.03%	-52.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-70.08%	-0.03%	-70.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.51%	-0.38%	-87.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.86%	0.00%	-79.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.98%	-0.03%	-46.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.49%	0.00%	+34.49%

Volatility

SRTS vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.08%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRTS	SHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	0.08%	+13.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.78%	0.14%	+49.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.53%	0.21%	+76.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.52%	0.29%	+81.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.30%	0.28%	+73.02%

Dividends

SRTS vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	3.78%	4.09%	5.02%	4.73%	1.39%	0.00%	0.74%	2.19%	1.66%	0.72%	0.34%	0.03%
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRTS and SHV in my portfolio?

SRTS and SHV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRTS or SHV?

SRTS has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to SHV (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs SHV's -0.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.17 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.