PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRS vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRS vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -19.00% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 8.77% return.


SRS

1D
0.77%
1M
2.10%
6M
-16.79%
YTD
-19.00%
1Y
-13.31%
3Y*
-11.13%
5Y*
-5.57%
10Y*
-15.86%

SRVR

1D
-0.36%
1M
-8.32%
6M
3.46%
YTD
8.77%
1Y
-1.52%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRS vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
-19.00%-1.45%-3.55%-18.78%54.68%-52.22%-33.05%-38.97%-3.77%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
8.77%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SRS and SRVR is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

-0.81

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SRS and SRVR has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.81 to -0.59, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRS vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRS
SRS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRS vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRSSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.00

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.10

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-0.20

-0.99

SRS vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRS and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRS vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRSSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-40.99%

-58.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.22%

-14.78%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.19%

-18.34%

-34.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.19%

-40.99%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-20.35%

-79.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.26%

-15.27%

-75.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

7.45%

+3.77%

Volatility

SRS vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.15%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRSSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

4.15%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.20%

13.95%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.73%

17.24%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.81%

19.84%

+17.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.79%

21.41%

+19.38%

SRS vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRS vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SRVR's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
3.56%3.61%6.06%4.49%0.30%0.00%0.19%1.80%0.47%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
2.81%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRS and SRVR have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRS has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to SRVR (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, SRVR leads with -3.37% vs -5.57% for SRS. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SRVR has performed better with a -3.37% return vs -5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.

SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.81% for SRVR.

SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.49% for SRVR.

SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRS and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer