PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRS vs. DRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRS vs. DRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than DRN's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed DRN with an annualized return of -16.52%, while DRN has yielded a comparatively higher -5.09% annualized return.


SRS

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-14.05%
6M
-12.14%
1Y
-9.76%
3Y*
-12.75%
5Y*
-5.84%
10Y*
-16.52%

DRN

1D
0.10%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
19.48%
6M
15.83%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
-11.56%
10Y*
-5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRS vs. DRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
-14.05%-1.45%-3.55%-18.78%54.68%-52.22%-33.05%-38.97%6.01%-18.03%
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
19.48%-11.24%-5.29%12.03%-67.26%152.94%-55.37%81.86%-25.11%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SRS and DRN is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2009

-0.99

The correlation between SRS and DRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SRS vs. DRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRS
DRN

Financial Services

71.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

19.6%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SRS
71.8%
DRN

-

Basic Materials

SRS

-

DRN
0.4%

Communication Services

SRS

-

DRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

SRS

-

DRN

-

Consumer Defensive

SRS

-

DRN

-

Energy

SRS

-

DRN

-

Healthcare

SRS

-

DRN

-

Industrials

SRS

-

DRN

-

Real Estate

SRS

-

DRN
19.6%

Technology

SRS

-

DRN

-

Utilities

SRS

-

DRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRS vs. DRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRS
SRS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRS vs. DRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRSDRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.07

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

0.32

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

0.72

-1.79

SRS vs. DRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the DRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRS and DRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRSDRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

0.20

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

-0.20

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.41

-0.08

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

0.21

-0.71

Drawdowns

SRS vs. DRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than DRN's maximum drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and DRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRSDRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-86.32%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.53%

-24.28%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.56%

-48.26%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.56%

-80.58%

+29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.82%

-86.32%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-65.93%

-34.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.23%

-35.07%

-56.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

10.91%

-1.83%

Volatility

SRS vs. DRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is 7.58%, while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that SRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRSDRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

11.13%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

28.89%

-9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

40.04%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.58%

56.65%

-19.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.67%

60.61%

-19.94%

SRS vs. DRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DRN's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRS vs. DRN - Dividend Comparison

SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than DRN's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
2.23%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
3.67%3.61%6.06%4.49%0.30%0.00%0.19%1.80%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRS and DRN have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRN has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to SRS (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs DRN's -86.32%.

On 10-year performance, DRN leads with -5.09% vs -16.52% for SRS. On fees, SRS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DRN has performed better with a -5.09% return vs -16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.

SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.23% for DRN.

SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.99% for DRN.

DRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRS and DRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer