PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOJ vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOJ achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 3.19% return.


CBOJ

1D
0.14%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
-6.30%
1Y
-1.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBOJ vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBOJ vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOJ
CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBOJKAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

1.72

-1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.26

2.47

-2.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.42

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.10

-2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.28

12.86

-13.14

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOJ and KAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOJKAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

1.72

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.73

-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between CBOJ and KAPR is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while KAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOJ drawdown since its inception was -8.13%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOJ and KAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOJKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-16.91%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-8.39%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

0.00%

-7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-4.02%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

1.37%

+2.82%

Volatility

CBOJ vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) is 0.92%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that CBOJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBOJKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.70%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

3.93%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

10.19%

-5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.79%

11.77%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

11.72%

-6.93%