SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L
SRIW.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from UBS and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIW.L returned 11.01%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRIW.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.
SRIW.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.21% | 6.01% | 19.08% | 21.28% | -15.04% | 26.40% | 12.45% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.77% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIW.L and JPLG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SRIW.L and JPLG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Financial Services
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Industrials
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Healthcare
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Defensive
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Communication Services
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Basic Materials
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Real Estate
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Utilities
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Energy
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRIW.L
JPLG.L
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIW.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.09 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 15.27 | -6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIW.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.90 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.95 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.69 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIW.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -27.53% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -5.59% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -13.65% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -13.65% | -7.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -3.30% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 1.50% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that SRIW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIW.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 1.96% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 5.88% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 7.87% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 10.90% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 13.75% | +2.56% |
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SRIW.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.10% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIW.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIW.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for SRIW.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer