SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SRIW.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and FCSG.L (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from UBS and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIW.L returned 11.01%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for FCSG.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRIW.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FCSG.L.

Performance

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than FCSG.L's -1.69% return.

SRIW.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: —

FCSG.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: -1.06%
• 1Y: -0.11%
• 3Y*: 6.29%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	9.21%	6.01%	19.08%	21.28%	-15.04%	26.33%
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation	-1.69%	3.93%	11.42%	6.17%	-3.68%	23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIW.L and FCSG.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021	0.49

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SRIW.L	FCSG.L
Technology	35.9%	14.0%
Financial Services	16.4%	29.4%
Industrials	11.8%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	4.0%
Healthcare	9.0%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	20.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	3.8%
Basic Materials	3.0%	4.6%
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-
Energy	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIW.L

SRIW.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SRIW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SRIW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SRIW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SRIW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FCSG.L

FCSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
FCSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FCSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FCSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FCSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FCSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRIW.L	FCSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	-0.01	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	0.04	+2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.01	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	-0.01	+2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.30	-0.04	+8.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FCSG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIW.L and FCSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRIW.L	FCSG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	-0.01	+1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.55	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.67	+0.33

Drawdowns

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than FCSG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and FCSG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRIW.L	FCSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.55%	-11.39%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-7.80%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	-9.70%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.55%	-11.39%	-10.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.95%	+4.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-2.65%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	3.12%	-0.41%

Volatility

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) at 2.83%. This indicates that SRIW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRIW.L	FCSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	2.83%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	6.95%	+1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	8.82%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	10.70%	+5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	10.67%	+5.64%

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSG.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRIW.L vs. FCSG.L - Dividend Comparison

SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while FCSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.01%	1.28%	1.25%	1.26%	1.47%	1.10%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRIW.L and FCSG.L in my portfolio?

SRIW.L and FCSG.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SRIW.L or FCSG.L?

On fees, SRIW.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRIW.L or FCSG.L?

SRIW.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FCSG.L.

What is the main difference between SRIW.L and FCSG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.75% for FCSG.L.