PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRIU.L vs. UB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than UB01.L's 6.40% return.


SRIU.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
8.42%
YTD
13.81%
6M
12.98%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

UB01.L

1D
0.60%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.48%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
13.81%3.18%21.24%25.25%-15.68%31.46%-7.21%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
6.40%28.34%6.43%19.85%-4.38%14.47%30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIU.L and UB01.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.24

Over the past year, SRIU.L and UB01.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRIU.L
UB01.L

Technology

44.2%
17.8%

Financial Services

12.0%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.6%

Industrials

9.9%
21.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.7%
4.6%

Energy

-

5.0%

Technology

SRIU.L
44.2%
UB01.L
17.8%

Financial Services

SRIU.L
12.0%
UB01.L
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SRIU.L
11.1%
UB01.L
9.6%

Industrials

SRIU.L
9.9%
UB01.L
21.7%

Healthcare

SRIU.L
9.1%
UB01.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SRIU.L
5.0%
UB01.L
5.4%

Communication Services

SRIU.L
3.6%
UB01.L
2.4%

Real Estate

SRIU.L
2.8%
UB01.L

-

Basic Materials

SRIU.L
1.6%
UB01.L
3.5%

Utilities

SRIU.L
0.7%
UB01.L
4.6%

Energy

SRIU.L

-

UB01.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIU.L
SRIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UB01.L
UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRIU.LUB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.05

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

6.42

+2.74

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the UB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIU.L and UB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRIU.LUB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.44

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.12

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.61

-0.96

Drawdowns

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum UB01.L drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and UB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRIU.LUB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-29.27%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-11.38%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-13.55%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-21.12%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.60%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-4.20%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.92%

-0.94%

Volatility

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) is 4.11%, while UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that SRIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRIU.LUB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.80%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

12.76%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

16.17%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

26.79%

-9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

31.14%

-10.38%

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than UB01.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SRIU.L vs. UB01.L - Dividend Comparison

SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than UB01.L's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.70%0.98%0.51%0.94%1.08%0.80%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.56%2.43%3.13%2.86%2.78%1.94%1.93%3.04%2.77%2.89%3.55%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRIU.L and UB01.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIU.L.

SRIU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UB01.L is Europe Equities. SRIU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.15% for UB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and UB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer