PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FRUE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SRIU.L is traded in GBp, while FRUE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FRUE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than FRUE.L's 12.48% return.


SRIU.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
8.42%
YTD
13.81%
6M
12.98%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

FRUE.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.17%
YTD
12.48%
6M
11.87%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
13.81%3.18%21.24%25.25%-15.68%31.46%-7.21%
FRUE.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
12.48%12.74%12.10%9.54%2.14%28.05%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIU.L and FRUE.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.64

The correlation between SRIU.L and FRUE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRIU.L
FRUE.L

Technology

44.2%
34.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
11.5%

Industrials

9.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
12.2%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.7%

Utilities

0.7%
1.6%

Energy

-

1.0%

Technology

SRIU.L
44.2%
FRUE.L
34.3%

Financial Services

SRIU.L
12.0%
FRUE.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SRIU.L
11.1%
FRUE.L
11.5%

Industrials

SRIU.L
9.9%
FRUE.L
10.1%

Healthcare

SRIU.L
9.1%
FRUE.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

SRIU.L
5.0%
FRUE.L
4.4%

Communication Services

SRIU.L
3.6%
FRUE.L
12.2%

Real Estate

SRIU.L
2.8%
FRUE.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

SRIU.L
1.6%
FRUE.L
1.7%

Utilities

SRIU.L
0.7%
FRUE.L
1.6%

Energy

SRIU.L

-

FRUE.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIU.L
SRIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FRUE.L
FRUE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRUE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRUE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRUE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRUE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRUE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FRUE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRIU.LFRUE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

5.16

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

17.84

-8.68

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FRUE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIU.L and FRUE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRIU.LFRUE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.41

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.94

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.85

-0.21

Drawdowns

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FRUE.L drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and FRUE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRIU.LFRUE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-25.31%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-5.91%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-20.18%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-20.18%

-2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.02%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-3.07%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.71%

+1.27%

Volatility

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FRUE.L) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRIU.LFRUE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.07%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

9.52%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.65%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

14.23%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

15.74%

+5.02%

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FRUE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SRIU.L vs. FRUE.L - Dividend Comparison

SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while FRUE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FRUE.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.70%0.98%0.51%0.94%1.08%0.80%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRIU.L and FRUE.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SRIU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SRIU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FRUE.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.25% for FRUE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and FRUE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer